:: People :: |
Editorial Team |
Reviewers |
Contact |
:: Policies :: |
Focus and Scope |
Peer Review Process |
Publication Ethics |
:: Submission :: |
Author Guidelines |
Reviewer Guidelines |
Copyright Notice |
Privacy Statement |
Manuscript Template |
The Peer Review process is a process where the journal assesses the quality of the manuscript before publication, reviewed by relevant experts in the field to review and write up the accepted manuscript. This process aims to help the editor determine whether the manuscript should be published in the Komprehenshif journal.
Important points in the Peer Review Process:
Manuscripts sent to journals first undergo initial screening by the editorial team.
Manuscripts that pass the examination will be sent to a minimum of two peer reviewers for review.
Peer reviewers independently make recommendations to the journal editor as to whether the manuscript should be rejected or accepted (with or without revisions).
The journal editor considers all feedback from peer reviewers and makes a decision to accept or reject the manuscript.
The Peer Review process for journal publications is basically a quality control mechanism, where experts circulate manuscripts with the aim of ensuring the quality of the published manuscripts. However, peer reviewers do not make decisions to accept or reject papers, but provide decision recommendations. In journals, decision-making authority rests only with the journal editor or journal editorial board.
:: People :: |
Editorial Team |
Reviewers |
Contact |
:: Policies :: |
Focus and Scope |
Peer Review Process |
Publication Ethics |
:: Submission :: |
Author Guidelines |
Reviewer Guidelines |
Copyright Notice |
Privacy Statement |
Manuscript Template |
Jurnal Komprehensif
Editorial Office of Jurnal Komprehensif| Edu Tech Jaya|
Email : edutechjayajournal@gmail.com
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.